« Relieving an itch or creative closure? | Main | Sunday garden moment »

July 08, 2005

Is health care changing?

Had outpatient surgery yesterday at Community Memorial Hospital of Ventura, and it was a neat experience. Not the surgery, of course (I'm fine, BTW, just an inguinal hernia repair). But it's one of the few times in a large healthcare facility I actualy felt like a customer, not just meat in a cattle herd. Everything was on time, not rushed, though highly efficient. Each of the dozen people I interacted with was attentive and filled me in on what they were doing, and going to be doing. I found their CYA stuff pretty interesting, though - not only did I have to answer four different times to four different people who I was, what I was there for, who my doctor was, etc., I also had to initial on my own skin which side of my stomach the hernia was on. Boy, that's not taking any chances on them cutting the wrong part of the wrong person!

Anyway, compared to many other hospital events over the years, for myself and others, it was refreshing to experience healthcare as a real business, in the most positive light. Like I was actually paying their salaries and keeping them in business or something.

I had an interesting window into healthcare as it was beginning to rock and roll with changes and regulations coming down the pike, in the late 1980's. At one time I had as clients in Boston: Mass General, Mass Eye & Ear, Salem Hospital, New England Medical Center, Beth Israel, and Harvard Community Health Plan (I was something of a cult figure in that world way back then!) In the early days, patients were given all kinds of attention, because insurance companies just paid out the wazoo for as long as people wanted to stick around. Then the crunch happened because healthcare couldn't get it together as an industry to control costs in time, and Big Brother had to step in. Then it became get-'m-in-and-out as fast as possible, because we're getting paid for the outcome, not the time. Now, who knows, good ole capitalism might have created another spin - how do we attract and maintain loyal customers?

Posted by David at July 8, 2005 11:29 AM

Comments

I have always commented on the idea that the one thing that will help control healthcare costs and, at the same time, increase patient satisfaction will be competition.

When a company has to fight for customers, clients or patients it will provide a better experience for its clients. It is an axiom that is true for every business, why not healthcare?

Glad to hear this is beginning to take off in the healthcare industry.

Posted by: Chris at July 8, 2005 01:29 PM

yes, healthcare is changing. I'm of the opinion that insurance is making healthcare MORE expensive. We took out daughter into the emergency room on April 23. Today is July 8th and we STILL DON'T HAVE THE BILL RESOLVED! No wonder it's so freakin' expensive!

Posted by: JLP at AllThingsFinancial at July 8, 2005 03:28 PM

I had an amazingly good experience at St. Vincent's Hospital in Santa Fe last summer with a sprained ankle that, thanks in large part to their treatment, did not stop me from walking all over Paris and then cycling around the Ypres Salient in Belgium two weeks later. I wasn't a local, so we went to the emergency room, and my husband was told by a colleague that it wasn't a very good hospital, which had us worried. But he was mistaken--I was seen promptly and the nurses and lab technicians knew exactly what they were doing. They were very nice and talked to me throughout, and I was sent home with a splint, lots of ice, medication I ended up not needing, and detailed instructions on how to speed up the healing. They were even able to get me an appointment with a local orthopedist the following week.


When I got the survey form from them I gave them a glowing review--and I sent them a donation as a kind of thank you, because the community they serve is very poor. And, from what I saw of interactions between hospital staff and other patients, some of whom were older Pueblo Indian ladies who seemed extremely uncomfortable about being inside a hospital, they serve the community very well. It's a far cry from the Chicago hospital where I was treated like a slab of meat ten years ago for a mysterious, frightening digestive ailment that went away on its own before I ever did get diagnosed.


I always fill out those surveys we get sent. I think the positive feedback is reinforcing--it helps to be told that taking the time and improving interactions with patients is worthwhile.

Posted by: tully monster at July 8, 2005 03:35 PM

Glad to hear your experience was good. Yes, we in healthcare are FINALLY "getting" the customer focus.

The CYA stuff--all part of the big patient safety push and everything you described in your blog and much more is now mandated by our accrediting agencies.

How do we attract and maintain loyal customers is definitely a focus now. In fact many sources have identified the two most important questions on patient satisfaction surveys to be: "Rate the overall quality of the care you received" and "How likely are you to recommend this facility to others". We look for what percentage of our patients rate us "top box" on both of these questions.

Healthcare--on one hand we are "cutting edge" (no pun intended)in terms of medical advances and on the other we are behind the curve in business principles. Hopefully someday we'll be in the lead on both! (I can dream)

Posted by: Donna at July 8, 2005 04:25 PM

Yeah to follow-up with Donna that whole "every person checked my id" deal is JCAHO standards (Good to hear that there is a facility that seems to actually be complying though).

Healthcare is a wacky business; foremost of course if the conflict of interest that occurs when your doctor profits from giving you the treatments that he recommends! That and as was mentioned (sort of) above, hospitals have tolerated lousy customer service and quality numbers that would have any normal business raising hell to correct. I'm still not sure that I understand the customer deal though, if your insurance mandates which hospital you go to then what does it matter what you think of that hospital? -D

Posted by: Dan at July 8, 2005 07:20 PM

Vincenzo's ...

David ... no comments on today's post, however am visiting in Santa Monica for a long weekend and ate tonight at Vincenzo's, based on your recommendation a few weeks ago. It was great! Vincenzo was a perfect host and the food / service was excellent.

Thanks for the recommendation,

Ranny

Posted by: Ranny Welton at July 8, 2005 10:30 PM

Interesting post David. I had a similar experience at a small hospital in Fallbrook a year ago. The customer service was way above normal and the people turned a "scary" experience into a pleasant one. I think the more choices that people have in healthcare the better the service will be. People will definitely go where the service is better.

Posted by: John Richardson at July 9, 2005 06:56 AM

I suppose if you an afford health care you might see a difference. I haven't been able to afford insurance for years.

Posted by: Fred at July 9, 2005 07:06 AM

Yep - had to initial my knee the same way. Glad you're ok David.

Posted by: Walter at July 9, 2005 07:32 AM

Actually, I think that it is. I went to HealthPartners Riverside here in Minneapolis a few months ago, and was absolutely stunned at the level of care they were providing.

It's probably a combination of "getting it" finally, and improved efficiency thanks to IT solutions.

Posted by: Dan at July 12, 2005 11:24 AM

Yes! Health care is changing.

I had an identical experience (and surgery) here in the Puget Sound at the Surgery Center at Highline Community Hospital five weeks ago today.

My wife and I noticed similar levels of care at Virginia Mason last year when she had a simple surgical procedure.

My thesis is that ideas of informed concent and the autonomy of the patient as a whole person are moving through the system, with the newer physicians having not experienced it any other way.

A very significant portent that I noticed was when a hospital was brave and trusting enough to apologize for an error that led to a fatality.

This strikes me as a major shift in trust.  I also know there is a downside.  My personal physician seems more harried, and a skilled surgeon confided in me that if he were chosing to go into medicine today, he might not, and he's not sure he would recommend it, although he loves what he does.  I think it is a problem with constant worrying about the consequences of error and feeling seriously micro-managed by remote bureaucratic forces.

In the case of my hernia surgery, I learned that if I had elected it after new regulations go into effect, I would have to have been put on beta blockers because someone decided to define a risk group for surgical heart and stroke risk that I would have fit into (age and high cholesterol even though that is now controlled by medication, diet, and exercize).  I wonder if there's no room for judgment of individual circumstances and consulting with the patient about it.  [;<).

Posted by: orcmid at July 13, 2005 03:45 PM

This is an interesting one. Visit my site at the link below.

Posted by: Jack at July 16, 2005 04:23 AM

Of course it is fact the realities of health care and the actual role of hospital came in surface when a person falls very sick.

Posted by: Susan R at January 25, 2006 11:47 PM

Health system is big problems in all over the world in my country the health department has declared the existing rate contract for the purchase of medicine five year ago but still yet we no receive any progress in this matters.

Posted by: Andrew Spark at February 15, 2006 12:50 AM

© 2009 All rights reserved. Terms of use