One thing that makes GTD different from the rest worlds is that you process items before you deal with them.That sometimes put me in frustration. First off, I don't really have the mood to think it...
![]() |
Type: Posts; User: AlexanderChow
One thing that makes GTD different from the rest worlds is that you process items before you deal with them.That sometimes put me in frustration. First off, I don't really have the mood to think it...
I have raised my awareness regarding the difference that working with a mere inbox and a dedicated process step would make.
since I draw the conclusion the difference isn't whether we would process...
Good question, I 'll quick glance the list rather than process it. you don't have to process it in order to know what is it. and once I pick up the one I am going to work on, that one would serve as...
I am glad that I have taken you here, and here's my thoughts that I posted in another thread:
"I don't see why I need to process it when I am not doing it. (and for most to-do apps, you just get...
I am still using omnifocus, but day to day things have reduced the system to a mere to do list. So I am look back and start to question the paradigm behind the system again.
I agree that I do need...
In practice, I haven't put a dedicated time for processing, I just go ahead and use the inbox as a conversation to move things forward.
I own omnifoucs, but oftentimes, I just do things from inbox. If it's a big one, then it would take me longer to finish it.
I don't see why I need to process it when I am not doing it. (and for most...
If Steve jobs had a 40k vision, it would not be what he turned out to be. I guess. So do we really need to make one?
I think DA's approach is too focused on outcome, I think most time what you are doing is what you 'd like to do as you are doing it. reading pleases me, I don't care what outcome it might be.
Thanks for the suggestion. I am reading "Steve Jobs".
Can you guys do something while reading this post? Whatever help is appreciated
I am using omnifocus iPad to deal with things, but it seems very bogey when things like reading a book keep living in my project list, I can't simply mark it as done. So where should they be?
"Somewhere DA said that you should avoid having one thought more than once unless you want to."
so, If I want to, it's still ok to think them. (during the period that I decide to do nothing).
"If...
"Maybe what you're doing is important, interesting, or useful; or maybe it isn't but it has to be done anyway. In the first case you want to get as much return as you can on your investment of time...
That makes sense, and it just like keep say, "play guitar" on my trusted system instead of writing each note down in it.
Hi, I am a software project manager, we use a framework called "SCRUM" to manage projects.
My questions is what need to go to the trusted system, should they look granular?
I noticed that most to do software diminish the concept of inbox.
You jot down things as they come to you, you check them off when you finish them.
However, GTD has a process workflow to go...
Now I know, you don't schedule them.
You pickup them based on the context, energy, etc.
But how should I keep those items? Where should they go?
You see, you can't simply check them as done, as...
This is just one of the three Models for Making Action Choices, Things like principles I guess, is kind of another story. Principle is all about how you should act, Should we put this in the...
I am categorizing my notes in evernote. I have much information that's not actionable, But give me directions. For example. good points in the GTD book, that somehow shred some light on me. If it...