Search:

Conejo23, yours is a very interesting approach, it has helped me to review GTD from a new and juicy point of view. Yes ... that is the paramount issue: Never lose the perspective.

and don´t forget ...

Hi all,

IMO, most inputs in this forum are very valuable, but still it can improve if they go together with a little of context. May I ask for 1 min. of your time to fill those 3 fields ?

(...

Thank you ellobogrande this helps.

Considering to use it, any experiences will be welcome.
http://bladewiki.blogspot.com/

:) Case of, still there where 1 or 2 ppl that don´t know this tip.

For example, you want to scan here declarations about self experiences with GTD, you put ["experience with GTD"...

I am also a GTD rookie, so that I can be wrong :

If you are using a paper based system, that depends on how much you are willing to write. Anyway I think that, to write it down twice it is...

Perhaps GTD is good precisely because it reflects pretty well the sad reality that has brought to us the information era : millions of people, all over the world, spending lot of time trying to find...

Thank you for all your insights. After them I made a search in the forum looking for messages with "processing" and "time", in Titles only.

There I found 6 interesting threads that I want to...

In my initial approach to GTD, I learned how important is to visualize the outcome. Now I am asking myself If really I am willing to initiate a process which can carry me to end up spending from 2...

So that, based on this estimate, and given that in-box has to be emptied daily ... really this system implies from 2 to 3 hours by day procesing things ?

:shock: Is this feasible ?
:shock:...

350 inputs /16 available hours in a day = 21.87 input/hour

You mean 21 inputs each of the 16 available hours in a day ? ... what kind of work is this ? one single call-center maniac ? :(

To...

:confused: Sorry, not able to find out in any place ...