he David Allen Company RSS Log Out Profile FAQ FAQ Forum Home
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: GTD Lite

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    81

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jamie Elis View Post
    A lot has to do with where you start--its like a group tennis lesson, some people are repeating the class every Spring, some graduate early to the intermediate group. And a lot has to do with

    Great way to look at it. Love it. Thank you.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Washington DC Area
    Posts
    582

    Default

    I'm agree with the concept of avoiding putting out fires and the value routines. I am able to focus on new and more challenging projects because I'm not continuously putting out fires, which may vary but always end up being pretty much the same thing. It doesn't mean they don't happen anymore, they just have been minimized by at least 80 or 90%.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Flower Mound (Dallas), Texas
    Posts
    2,584

    Default Fires and GTD

    Maybe one of the best things about a solid GTD practice is the ability to respond to fires when they happen without too much impact on the rest of your life....and, of course, eliminating self-created fires due to losing things, forgetting things, and severe procrastination.
    I am the Party

  4. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Barb View Post
    Maybe one of the best things about a solid GTD practice is the ability to respond to fires when they happen without too much impact on the rest of your life....and, of course, eliminating self-created fires due to losing things, forgetting things, and severe procrastination.
    But is it possible to use the input handling processes from GTD to (somewhat) do this without the rest of the system - as per the original post in this thread?

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,478

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LifeButBetter View Post
    But is it possible to use the input handling processes from GTD to (somewhat) do this without the rest of the system - as per the original post in this thread?
    I think DA himself has said that some people will only pick up a few tweaks from the book, rather than embracing the whole system.

    *shrug* If it works for you, who cares whether it's canonical GTD or not?

    Katherine

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    428

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LifeButBetter View Post
    Is it possible to use the input handling processes from GTD to (somewhat) do this without the rest of the system
    It's probably possible. Taking a quick look at the input handling processes, these are all the touch points:

    Inbox
    Trash
    Someday/Maybe
    Reference
    Projects
    Waiting For
    Next Actions
    Calendar

    If those were the only parts of GTD you kept, some things could be jettisoned: Horizons of Focus and Weekly Review are probably the big ones.

    I don't know how practical it would be to run that sort of system. If you get it up and running, let us know how it works out.


    Cheers,
    Roger

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Roger View Post
    It's probably possible. Taking a quick look at the input handling processes, these are all the touch points:

    Inbox
    Trash
    Someday/Maybe
    Reference
    Projects
    Waiting For
    Next Actions
    Calendar

    I've been a "GTD Lite" follower for some time now, and the parts described above are pretty much it. I never got around to implementing the weekly review or the horizons of focus, though I can definately see the benefit of adding these parts to my system.

    But having not been a hard-core GTDer for some time now, I can tell you that even following just parts of the system can make a huge difference in your life. As long as it works for you and you've got a system that's easy to use, you'll see the benefits as I have.

    For me, the contextual action lists have had the most significant impact in my workflow. My non-project action lists and daily calendar are all on paper, which I use daily and carry with me in a small 8.5"x5.5" binder that is divided by section. For larger projects, especially those having many moving parts to them, I often use OneNote to stay on top of things, as well as a physical filing system for all my reference materials.

    I may implement other parts of the GTD system down the road.

    Some of the religious followers of GTD will tell you that you have to implement the entire system's methodology as it is designed to be followed, that you gotta do it "the GTD way" or it's a no-go. I don't listen to them. Neither should anyone else.

    Never feel you shouldn't do GTD because you can't follow the ENTIRE system -- so you then give up on it altogether. Start with the elements of the system your gut tells you can help improve your workflow, and do those parts. In time these components will become second nature to you.

    That said, there's room for improvement in my own "GTD Lite" implementation. But still, I can't ignore the many positive effects brought on by having implemented only a partial system.

    Two thumbs up for GTD Lite here!

  8. #18

    Default

    FYI, David Allen Co have emailed me asking me not to use the term GTD Lite because GTD is a registered trademark. I've change d the title of the article accordingly.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Project planning Lite
    By Dave John in forum PUBLIC: Discuss Getting Things Done
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-19-2010, 07:02 AM
  2. GTD Lite
    By dal1mdm in forum PUBLIC: Discuss Getting Things Done
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 05-27-2006, 07:53 AM
  3. GTD Lite
    By Anonymous in forum PUBLIC: Discuss Getting Things Done
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 03-16-2005, 10:12 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts