he David Allen Company RSS Log Out Profile FAQ FAQ Forum Home
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Next Next-Action

  1. #1

    Default Next Next-Action

    Hi All,

    I've not been using GTD for very long, but have already found it very useful. My to-do lists are now a lot more do-able!

    Sorry if the following is a bit vague/long. I'll try to clarify if necessary.

    I've found that I have a bottleneck in my system:

    I have a huge number of Next Actions split across my various contexts (@PC, @Home, @Calls, etc). I find that after completing an action, I get stuck when it comes to the next action from that same project.

    If I may give an example, say I have two projects with the planned steps as follows:
    1: Get Car Fixed.
    -1A: Call John on [phone number] to get the name of the mechanic. @Calls.
    -1B: Phone Mechanic on [number] to book car in for service. @Calls.
    -1C: Take car to garage. @Errands.

    2: Book Holiday.
    -2A: Google accommodation in New York. @PC
    -2B: Contact hotel asking about availability of room. @Calls.
    - etc.

    Ideally my @Calls list would just have the first call (ie 1A) on it. I'd like 1B and 2B to 'appear' on the list when the preceding project action is completed. The problem is that I like to get through my list of calls before moving onto a review - so I might forget to call the garage after asking John for their number (it is just an example!).

    Using a paper system, is it simply a matter of tracking back to the project list and re-writing the next action on the to-do list? This seems like there's a lot of repetition if every Next Action is written in both a Project and a Context list.

    Is there any software/website which has this function (to avoid repetition)?

    EDIT: I've realised there was another thread about a similar problem last week. Sorry.
    Last edited by stopped_clock; 03-02-2010 at 06:28 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    St. Louis, MO USA
    Posts
    1,538

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stopped_clock View Post
    Is there any software/website which has this function (to avoid repetition)?
    Yes, there is, but what platform do you use or are willing to use? The most GTD-ish one that comes to mind is OmniFocus (mac and iphone).

  3. #3

    Default

    I'd investigated Omnifocus and it sounded good, but I'm on Windows unfortunately.

    I was hoping for something web-based (with a mobile interface) or for Windows. I've tried both RTM and Toodledo and they're both nearly right for me!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Warszawa, Poland
    Posts
    3,140

    Lightbulb You can try Nozbe too.

    Quote Originally Posted by stopped_clock View Post
    I was hoping for something web-based (with a mobile interface) or for Windows. I've tried both RTM and Toodledo and they're both nearly right for me!
    You can try Nozbe too: http://www.nozbe.com.
    TesTeq - Follow me on Twitter - BIZNES BEZ STRESU (blog in Polish)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    428

    Default

    Hello and welcome to our little corner of GTD.

    There's a lot more going on with these sorts of scenarios than may first meet the eye. So let's consider a few things:

    Say I have two projects with the planned steps as follows:
    1: Get Car Fixed.
    -1A: Call John on [phone number] to get the name of the mechanic. @Calls.
    -1B: Phone Mechanic on [number] to book car in for service. @Calls.
    -1C: Take car to garage. @Errands.



    Ideally my @Calls list would just have the first call (ie 1A) on it. I'd like 1B and 2B to 'appear' on the list when the preceding project action is completed.

    The main risk, in general, with that sort of approach is that it presupposes that nothing will occur during 1A that would make 1B less than ideal. Every one and every project has a different level of tolerance for that risk.

    Using a paper system, is it simply a matter of tracking back to the project list and re-writing the next action on the to-do list? This seems like there's a lot of repetition if every Next Action is written in both a Project and a Context list.

    Keeping every action on its own piece of paper reduces this repetition. It's just a matter of moving the sheet from one folder to another.

    I think a productive way to analyze that particular example is by considering: after calling John for the mechanic's name, where does that information go?


    On a slightly-more general topic, it's worthwhile taking a look at the Workflow Diagram while asking: Is it ever possible, by following the diagram, to have something on a Next Action list that would take less than 2 minutes to complete?



    Cheers,
    Roger

  6. #6

    Default

    Thanks for the replies everyone.

    I think the easiest thing for me is to move to a paper-only system. Although I'm very tech-focussed, I seem to be conentrating more on the system than the contents. I think I need to do it all manually for a bit first!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    423

    Default Projects & Next Actions

    I find it helpful to limit next actions to only the literal next physical, visible action. With other sequential or future actions there is a risk they could change and it would be a pain to rework my next actions lists.

    In most cases projects are simple enough to not have to worry about "forgetting" the sequential items. But another alternative is creating Action Support materials to manage that data separate from projects & actions lists.

    How I would organize:

    Projects list
    "Car is fixed"

    Next action
    "Call (Friend) to get name of mechanic, ###-###-####

    I'd probably start a page so that when I call my friend I could note the name and number of the mechanic. That page becomes Action Support. And when I get done with the call to my friend I either put "Call mechanic ..." on my Calls list right away or make the call if the situation warrants.

    I do this in a paper-based system (Time/Design) and it works a lot more smoothly than I probably make it sound.

    Mark
    How did you capture that thought?

  8. #8

    Default

    Thanks Mark.

    What do you mean by time/design.

    Things actually seem easier dealing just with paper (YMMV etc!). I've got a system coming together now which is similar to what you suggest, where each project gets a page of notes (unless it's trivial). This give a suggestion for the next action rather than a prescription.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    423

    Default Time/Design

    Apologize for not making that clear.

    Time/Design is a company (changing name to Time/System) that sells paper-based tools that fit nicely with GTD Organizing.

    Time/System
    http://www.timesystem.us/
    How did you capture that thought?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    117

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stopped_clock View Post
    If I may give an example, say I have two projects with the planned steps as follows:
    1: Get Car Fixed.
    -1A: Call John on [phone number] to get the name of the mechanic. @Calls.
    -1B: Phone Mechanic on [number] to book car in for service. @Calls.
    -1C: Take car to garage. @Errands.
    Only plan one next action for this. Who knows? Maybe John knows how you can fix it yourself without paying $$$ to the mechanic.

    Whatever your system, have paper and pen ready when calling John (in fact have paper and pen available always whenever physically possible). Write down whatever John and you come up with and:

    1. If it takes less than 2 minutes just do it (eg call mechanic)
    2. If it's urgent then do it or plan to do it today (eg mechanic is going on vacation next week)
    3. If it's neither 1 nor 2 and you can't deal with it right then, put the piece of paper into your inbox and deal with it when you're in processing mode.

    There's no such thing as a next-next action, there's only next possibilities/ probabilities. If they're obvious then there's no point documenting them. Only record what you're likely to forget.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. When is an Action not a Project Action
    By swashbuckler in forum PUBLIC: Discuss Getting Things Done
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-10-2009, 05:59 AM
  2. How can I track what next action a completed action triggers?
    By bigmish in forum PUBLIC: Discuss Getting Things Done
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-10-2008, 03:29 PM
  3. putting single action projects in life areas instead of the single action project cat
    By dwayneneckles in forum PUBLIC: Discuss Gear & Software for GTD
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-15-2007, 08:19 AM
  4. Must I have all action options in the Next Action lists?
    By Borisoff in forum PUBLIC: Discuss Getting Things Done
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 07-21-2006, 08:36 AM
  5. Next action lists vs Action files vs Customized tickler file
    By ggrozier in forum PUBLIC: Discuss Getting Things Done
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-06-2004, 04:04 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts