he David Allen Company RSS Log Out Profile FAQ FAQ Forum Home
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Am I a micro-manager???

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    14

    Default Am I a micro-manager???

    I have five direct reports: marketing director, sales director, bids director and presales director and hr director. They are my areas of focus. The also have areas of focus, i.e. HR has provide incoming flow of candidates, optimize motivation, keep staf happy etc. areas of focus. When we have regular meetings I run with them through their AOFs and projects, noting down next actions they promise to do till the next meeting. I end up with my system full of their projects

    Is that so-called micro-management? If the answer is yes, then what should I ask during our weekly meetings to have that at the proper management level?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    414

    Default

    I would think the only "micro-managey" thing about what you've said is that you run through their AOF, etc. at your regular meetings. Surely it's enough to just have them report back on what they're responsible to you for, and hold them accountable for same?

    You do not need to track their projects and next actions as if they're your own - just whatever they're due to deliver directly to you, as well as any significant "check-in" milestones, deliverables, etc. You can track those on your calendar and waiting for list.

    At annual review time, it is up to them to have kept track of everything they've accomplished and report accordingly.
    Carolyn J. Sullivan
    Executive Assistant, Writer, Business Owner and Musician
    Secrets of An Accidental Admin
    A Walk On The Roses

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    St. Louis, MO USA
    Posts
    1,538

    Default

    I also question if your direct reports are appropriate areas of focus. Sales might be an area of focus, for example, but your goals should not be implemented vicariously. You should have your own projects, not theirs.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    282

    Default

    I think this is a great question! However there are so many point of view that we would take in great consideration. As their manager, however, I think you are more interested to get the best out of them. To get it and to prepare some good questions I thought immediately to the book "Coaching for performance" by John Withmore. In this book you can find the GROW model to ask questions. Goal, Reality, Options, Will

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    14

    Default

    Thanks for comments. Though I didn't understand what level should I track with them: goals, areas of focus, projects or next actions?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Warszawa, Poland
    Posts
    3,140

    Post Treat each of your directs individualy.

    Quote Originally Posted by Onion View Post
    Thanks for comments. Though I didn't understand what level should I track with them: goals, areas of focus, projects or next actions?
    The main problem with delegation is that you haven't five direct reports. You have five people reporting to you. Five different people. Not average direct reports but different people. Some may require micromanaging (and in the longterm it is not a good approach) and some can manage their areas of responsibility better than you without any supervision (and in the long term it is a perfect situation).

    The bottom line is - to be effective you've got to treat each of your directs individualy. It is more difficult than "standard" approach but gives much better results.
    TesTeq - Follow me on Twitter - BIZNES BEZ STRESU (blog in Polish)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    414

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TesTeq View Post
    The main problem with delegation is that you haven't five direct reports. You have five people reporting to you. Five different people. Not average direct reports but different people. Some may require micromanaging (and in the longterm it is not a good approach) and some can manage their areas of responsibility better than you without any supervision (and in the long term it is a perfect situation).

    The bottom line is - to be effective you've got to treat each of your directs individualy. It is more difficult than "standard" approach but gives much better results.
    I totally agree. I also agree with someone else on this thread who said that the five reports aren't Areas of Focus - "Staff Productivity/Success" (or however you want to word it) would be. And they're not each a "project" - they're just people you would have an "Agenda" list for - so you would keep track of whatever you need to discuss with them at your next meeting. It might be "What is Status of XYZ" or it might be "How was your daughter's dance recital?"

    Your overall department deliverables would also be an Area of Focus, and you would ideally have a "big picture" view of what's happening, what's delegated, etc. (Either a mind map, larger project plan, or whatever makes sense to your particular industry.)
    Carolyn J. Sullivan
    Executive Assistant, Writer, Business Owner and Musician
    Secrets of An Accidental Admin
    A Walk On The Roses

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Saint Simons Island, GA
    Posts
    61

    Default Agree with Carolyn & TesTeq

    You may want to take a look at what is now "an oldie but a goodie", namely Hersey/Blanchard's information on Situational Leadership.

    This will give you a much better idea on what level of item(s) you will end up following for each of your direct reports.
    John Ohman

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    282

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by johnaohman View Post
    "an oldie but a goodie"
    One more appropriate, short, immediate is The One Minute Manager. Should be also an idea for a present! Why not?

  10. #10

    Red face Hello

    Brazilian Gradiente company has launched Android powered smartphone called iPhone Neo One. However, this device does not have any relation to Apple, iOS or the iPhone cult.

    Gradiente iPhone owns a 3.7-inch sim nam sinh screen, camera 5 "dots", can run 2 sim, support Wi-Fi, 3G and a microSD memory card slot. Machine running the operating system Android 2.3 Gingerbread. Brazilian iPhone version will cost $ 300.

    However, the current technology world are interested are not included in the iPhone Neo One is that the dynamics of an "apple" for this problem.

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts